In mid-July Siva Vaidhyanathan and Peter Hirtle discussed through blogging the question of whether an author (Siva Vaidhyanathan) could grant permission for one of his chapters to be copied for use in a lecture. The discussion was really interesting. Here is the blog references.
Here is the original comments by Siva Vaidhyanathan: http://www.nyu.edu/classes/siva/2004/07/fair-use-in-inaction.html
He suggests that the professor who requested the permission should have not requested it and just assumed fair use. The library seemed to have a problem with this. Siva reponds. It's worth the read.
Here is the link to Peter's comments at Librarylaw blog: http://blog.librarylaw.com/librarylaw/2004/07/copyfight_fair_.html
Peter, an archivist, chimmed in. He, like Siva, analyzes the four factors.
This discussion was also picked up at Copyfight entitled "Fair Use It or Lose It" - Posted by Donna Wentworth on July 7, 2004. http://www.corante.com/copyfight/archives/004834.html
What I am wondering is what about the teaching guidelines that we have all seen for so long (not law, of course, but guidelines) that include a chapter as a reasonable amount to copy. Isn't this what we are doing in the classroom and what libraries are doing when they will only copy one chapter for you? How does this fit within the discussion? These guidelines do not use the four-factor test but give exact amounts you can use.
Hallo you! Great site. I found exactly the information I was looking for. I will recommendyou page to all my friends.
I heard of your site and just wanted to see what´s up here. Really nice place. See you again sometime.
I wish you great success, good luck and a lot of fun for the future. Maybe one day you will really be the best of all.
Posted by: Hugo | December 28, 2004 at 01:51 AM
Just be surfing around in net. I definitely fpund a very informal place with a lot of good stuff for everybody. I will
certainly visit your site again sometime. Really good work.
Posted by: Joe Connor | April 27, 2005 at 01:45 AM